Public discussion of patriotism raises questions about how national identity and civic responsibility are understood, especially when influenced by its association with extremist narratives. Efforts to challenge these groups can also increase their visibility, making it harder to distinguish between legitimate expressions of national interest and fringe views.
Is it wrong to discuss patriotism?
I had an interesting encounter with someone recently who cautioned me against writing on it. The person suggested the word has bad connotations because of faux-nationalistic extremist groups.
I explained there is no other (simple) word that captures love of country and the desire to seek the greater good where it conflicts with a narrower objective.
I looked into why this word might be a concern. There appear to be two broad trends driving it.
The first is a trend where negative fringe narratives are amplified in public debate. Prominent people re-share extremist perspectives, ostensibly to raise awareness of how toxic they are, but, in reality, bringing repugnant views to a wide audience.
The second is a trend of academics increasingly publishing ‘popular’ commentary on extremist movements. While I respect people’s right to publish, perhaps it would be better if this research is used mainly to inform law enforcement efforts to counter threats posed by these groups.
The problem with both trends is that paying attention to extremists gives their views reach and credibility. It may even attract greater numbers of vulnerable people to join their cause!
It is terrible that extremists can take a concept like patriotism, which at its heart is quite beautiful, and twist and warp it to the point where someone counsels me against using it.
I reached the conclusion that, if I was to stop talking about patriotism, I would be giving an extremist movement a power over my words it should not – and should never – possess.
Ultimately, if we have something to say that may help others, I believe it is our duty to promote that (positive) narrative.
It is important to show leadership, regardless of what anyone on the fringes is doing or saying.
Edith Cavell famously said, on the eve of her execution as a spy in World War One, ‘I realise that patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone.’
Cavell’s words remain timeless.
Patriotism only makes sense if it forms part of a broader outlook of care for others as fellow human beings worthy of dignity and respect.
We should not permit a minority to set the terms for the majority’s participation in public debate.
Rather, I believe each of us should confidently forge our own path.
We should always say (respectfully) what we sincerely believe needs to be said to advance our society and the national interest.
I intend to keep writing about patriotism.
First published on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/wrong-write-patriotism-margaret-joseph-t489c/?trackingId=JpCJRrk4QDK24HeAm5nbcg%3D%3D
